Jurisdiction based solely on the territoriality principle is becoming less evident in the digital age This article engages in a discussion with authors such as Kuner and Svantesson, that have expressed a critical view on expansive jurisdiction of the EU data protection regime in issue 4, November 2015, of this Journal. Our contribution focuses on the choices with regard to scope and jurisdiction made by the EU co-legislators in Article 3 of the new EU General Data Protection Regulation (hereinafter, ‘General Regulation’ or ‘GDPR’),6 which will apply from 25 May 2018, and compares this to the current regime under Article 4 of the Data Protection Directive. It also assesses whether the modernized Council of Europe Convention for the protection of individuals with regard to automatic processing of personal data (No 108) is heading in a similar direction and highlights the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) position on the territorial scope of the EU data protection law.

中文翻译：

---

将欧洲数据保护范围扩大到境外：广义数据保护条例第 3 条在更广泛的背景下

仅基于属地原则的管辖权在数字时代变得不那么明显本文与 Kuner 和 Svantesson 等作者进行了讨论，他们在 2015 年 11 月第 4 期中对欧盟数据保护制度的广泛管辖权表达了批评意见，本刊。我们的贡献侧重于欧盟共同立法者在新的欧盟通用数据保护条例（以下简称“通用条例”或“GDPR”）第 3 条中做出的范围和管辖权选择，该条例将于 5 月 25 日生效2018 年，并将其与数据保护指令第 4 条下的现行制度进行比较。