In recent years, the principle of ‘living together’ has emerged in the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights as a possible justification for limitations on the rights to freedom of religion and to respect for private life. This note assesses the meaning of this principle, and, in particular, the critical development in its conceptualisation marked by the recent judgment of Osmanoglu and Kocabas v Switzerland (2017). Although the notion of ‘living together’ is not explicitly mentioned in this case, I suggest that its ethos underlies the judgment entirely, and that what can ultimately be drawn from the reasoning of the Court in this case is a vision of ‘living together’ as consisting in ‘living in exactly the same way’.

中文翻译：

---

“一起生活”、“一起学习”和“一起游泳”：Osmanoğlu 和 Kocabaş 诉瑞士案（2017 年）以及集体生活的构建

近年来，“共同生活”的原则出现在欧洲人权法院的判例中，作为限制宗教自由和尊重私人生活的权利的可能理由。本说明评估了该原则的含义，特别是其概念化的关键发展，以 Osmanoglu 和 Kocabas v Switzerland (2017) 最近的判决为标志。虽然在本案中没有明确提到“共同生活”的概念，但我认为它的精神完全是判决的基础，并且最终可以从法院在本案中的推理中得出的是“共同生活”的愿景包括“以完全相同的方式生活”。