This intervention queries whether subjecting feminist jurisprudence to a methodological transfiguration toward pragrammatology (Derrida, in Smith and Kerrigan 1984) holds liberating potential for f (be it ‘woman’, ‘female’ or ‘feminine’) as both a signifier and a subject to be read with lucidity and nuance in feminist justice claims. I examine feminist jurisprudence’s methodological challenges in the settler colonial context of Alaska with respect to the murders of Della Brown (in 2000) and Mindy Schloss (in 2007). I advance my case for pragrammatology as a critical methodology for feminist jurisprudence by subjecting the case(s) of Brown and Schloss to a more lucid (re)reading in two related and intersecting moves. First, I trace and deconstruct the citations of Brown and Schloss’ legal narratives to expose violence in the systemisation of f as a power and legal relation (Ahmed in Soc Legal Stud 4:55–73, 1995). I then examine the paradoxical nature of f justice claims which necessitate a pragrammatological approach. I conclude by advancing counsel on how we might move within paradox.

中文翻译：

---

什么：阿拉斯加州诉韦德案中的语用学和悖论政治

这种干预质疑将女权主义法学置于语用学的方法论变形中（德里达，史密斯和凯瑞甘 1984 年）是否具有将 f（无论是“女人”、“女性”还是“女性”）作为能指和主体的解放潜力。在女权主义正义主张中清晰而细微地阅读。我研究了阿拉斯加定居者殖民背景下女权主义法学在德拉布朗（2000 年）和明迪施洛斯（2007 年）被谋杀案方面的方法论挑战。我通过将布朗和施洛斯的案例以两个相关且交叉的动作进行更清晰的（重新）阅读来推进我的语用学案例，作为女性主义法学的一种批判方法。第一的，我追溯并解构了 Brown 和 Schloss 的法律叙述的引文，以揭露 f 作为一种权力和法律关系的系统化中的暴力（Ahmed in Soc Legal Stud 4:55-73, 1995）。然后，我考察了需要一种语用学方法的正义主张的悖论性质。最后，我提出了关于我们如何在悖论中行动的建议。