Judicial bias in sexual assault cases is generally associated with the conduct of sitting judges who engage in victim blaming and reserve the full protection of the law to ideal victims. However, this paper seeks to examine the role of the Canadian Judicial Council (CJC) in perpetuating sexist stereotypes in the legal realm. It does so by juxtaposing the CJC’s handling of two judicial misconduct complaints, one in which a male judge exhibited bias against women while adjudicating a sexual assault trial and a second in which graphic, sexual pictures of a female judge were posted on the internet without her knowledge or consent. The proposition offered is that the CJC’s gendered record in disposing of the two judicial misconduct cases was similarly informed by the notional ideal victim, further perpetuating sexism both in Canadian courtrooms and among the judiciary.

中文翻译：

---

性、性别歧视和司法不端行为：加拿大司法委员会如何在法律领域延续性别歧视

性侵犯案件中的司法偏见通常与在职法官的行为有关，他们指责受害者并将法律的充分保护保留给理想的受害者。然而，本文旨在研究加拿大司法委员会 (CJC) 在使法律领域的性别歧视定型观念永久化方面的作用。它通过将 CJC 对两起司法不当行为投诉的处理并列来实现，其中一个是男法官在裁决性侵犯审判时表现出对女性的偏见，第二个是在没有她的情况下在互联网上发布了女法官的色情图片知情或同意。提议的提议是，CJC 在处理两起司法不当行为案件时的性别记录也同样由名义上的理想受害者提供信息，