当前位置: X-MOL 学术Eur. Const. Law Rev. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Unilateral Revocability in Wightman: Fixing Article 50 with Constitutional Tools, ECJ 10 December 2018, Case C-621/18, Andy Wightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union
European Constitutional Law Review ( IF 1.6 ) Pub Date : 2019-05-31 , DOI: 10.1017/s1574019619000142
Jure Vidmar

Following the expedited proceedings, a Full Court ruling was delivered merely three months later, on 10 December 2018. This analysis will scrutinise the Court’s reasoning pertaining to the admissibility and substance of the case. Despite the political sensitivity ofWightman, this analysis will focus only on the ruling’s legal dimensions. In the admissibility phase, the Court of Justice considered the argument of the United Kingdom government that the question was merely hypothetical and

中文翻译:

Wightman 的单方面可撤销性:用宪法工具修复第 50 条,ECJ 2018 年 12 月 10 日,C-621/18 案例,Andy Wightman 等诉国务卿退出欧盟

在加速程序之后,仅三个月后,即 2018 年 12 月 10 日,合议庭作出了裁决。这一分析将仔细审查法院关于案件可受理性和实质内容的推理。尽管怀特曼具有政治敏感性,但这一分析将只关注裁决的法律层面。在受理阶段,法院考虑了英国政府的论点,即该问题仅是假设性的,
更新日期:2019-05-31
down
wechat
bug