The Swedish supreme courts as part of the public administration, rather than as independent actors – Political, legal, and administrative reasons behind this positioning – A recent trend shifts the position of the supreme courts – Endogenous forces (e.g. a more ‘conflictual’ political climate) and exogenous reasons (e.g. the increasing importance of the judicial-made EU law) – Swedish supreme courts nearer to being a body with the primary duty of safeguarding the law against the executive and legislative powers – ‘Full’ positioning of supreme courts within the judicial core not an essential institutional requirement for a democracy – Important role of the public administration’s degree of dependence on the legislative power

中文翻译：

---

瑞典最高法院的定位——一个民主的怪事？

瑞典最高法院作为公共行政的一部分，而不是作为独立行为者——这一定位背后的政治、法律和行政原因——最近的趋势改变了最高法院的立场——内生力量（例如，更具“冲突性”的政治气候) 和外部原因（例如，司法制定的欧盟法律的重要性日益增加） – 瑞典最高法院更接近于成为一个主要职责是保护法律免受行政和立法权力影响的机构 – 最高法院在欧盟内部的“完全”定位司法核心不是民主的必要制度要求——公共行政对立法权的依赖程度的重要作用