当前位置: X-MOL 学术Eur. Const. Law Rev. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
EU citizens’ rights post Brexit: why direct effect beyond the EU is not enough
European Constitutional Law Review ( IF 1.6 ) Pub Date : 2018-08-29 , DOI: 10.1017/s1574019618000317
Stijn Smismans

Brexit – EU citizens’ rights – Direct effect beyond the EU – The Withdrawal Agreement does not protect citizens properly – Copying substantive provisions of EU law and parts of the EU’s supranational features, such as direct effect, does not provide equal protection for EU citizens once a country is no longer part of the EU – UK-specific implementation measures to be set out in Withdrawal Agreement or Protocol – Guarantees also to be set out in primary legislation – UK Government intends to act to a great extent via secondary legislation – relationship between the Withdrawal Act and the Withdrawal Agreement and Implementation Bill

中文翻译:

英国脱欧后的欧盟公民权利:为什么在欧盟之外的直接影响是不够的

英国脱欧 – 欧盟公民的权利 – 欧盟以外的直接影响 – 脱欧协议没有适当保护公民 – 复制欧盟法律的实质性条款和欧盟的部分超国家特征,例如直接影响,一旦发生就不能为欧盟公民提供平等的保护一个国家不再是欧盟的一部分 – 英国的具体实施措施将在退出协议或议定书中规定 – 担保也将在主要立法中规定 – 英国政府打算在很大程度上通过次要立法采取行动 – 两国之间的关系退出法案和退出协议和实施法案
更新日期:2018-08-29
down
wechat
bug