当前位置: X-MOL 学术Eur. Const. Law Rev. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Countering the Judicial Silencing of Critics: Article 2 TEU Values, Reverse Solange, and the Responsibilities of National Judges
European Constitutional Law Review ( IF 1.6 ) Pub Date : 2019-09-13 , DOI: 10.1017/s1574019619000324
Armin von Bogdandy , Luke Dimitrios Spieker

EU Rule of law crisis – Article 2 TEU – EU values – EU fundamental rights – Freedom of speech – Member state courts – Interpretation of national law in conformity with Article 2 TEU values – Preliminary reference – Duty of referral – Criminal liability of judges – Reverse SolangeASJP judgment – Judicial applicability of Article 2 TEU – Value-oriented interpretation of EU law – Mutual Amplification – Essence of EU fundamental rights – L.M. judgment – Aranyosi judgment – Federal balance – Red lines – Systemic deficiencies – Solange presumption – Mutual trust

中文翻译:

反对批评者的司法沉默:第 2 条 TEU 价值观、反向索朗日和国家法官的责任

欧盟法治危机 – 第 2 条 TEU – 欧盟价值观 – 欧盟基本权利 – 言论自由 – 成员国法院 – 根据第 2 条 TEU 价值观解释国家法律 – 初步参考 – 转介义务 – 法官的刑事责任 –反向索朗日ASJP判决 – 第 2 条 TEU 的司法适用性 – 欧盟法律的价值解释 – 相互放大 – 欧盟基本权利的本质 –LM. 判断——阿兰约西判断 – 联邦平衡 – 红线 – 系统性缺陷 –索朗日推定——相互信任
更新日期:2019-09-13
down
wechat
bug