Abstract Over the last three and a half decades, much research has been conducted on how accurately learners can discriminate their comprehension of texts, that is, relative metacomprehension accuracy. The evidence suggests that this skill is usually not well-developed among learners. To assess the average level of relative metacomprehension accuracy and to explore which factors might influence this level, we conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis. The results obtained from 145 independent subgroups of 94 empirical studies indicate that relative metacomprehension accuracy is only moderate (r = 0.24, 95% CI [0.21, 0.26]). At the same time, the level of relative metacomprehension accuracy was found to be moderated by a number of factors related to the learners (e.g., education level), texts (e.g., practice texts), judgments (e.g., time point of predictions), and tests (e.g., question format).

中文翻译：

---

学习者如何准确区分他们对文本的理解？相对元理解准确性及影响因素的综合元分析

摘要 在过去三年半的时间里，关于学习者如何准确区分他们对文本的理解，即相对元理解准确性，已经进行了大量研究。有证据表明，这种技能在学习者中通常没有得到很好的发展。为了评估相对元理解准确度的平均水平并探索哪些因素可能影响这一水平，我们进行了全面的荟萃分析。从 94 项实证研究的 145 个独立亚组获得的结果表明，相对元理解准确度仅为中等（r = 0.24，95% CI [0.21, 0.26]）。同时，发现相对元理解准确度的水平受与学习者（例如，教育水平）、文本（例如，练习文本）、判断（例如，