ABSTRACT This initial work on evaluating standardisation tries to explore to what extent standardisation can be evaluated in the same way as terminology planning and language policy and planning. The main reason for exploring this issue is that this kind of evaluation is necessary and has not been undertaken systematically. The work aims to verify the basic hypothesis that terminology planning evaluation (TPE) and language policy and planning evaluation (LPPE) can be applied to the evaluation of standardisation. So, the general question addressed is to what extent can standardisation be evaluated according to the models for TPE and LPPE. After presenting Haugen’s model of standardisation and complementing it with some concepts about language corpus planning and restandardisation, this model is analysed from the perspectives of PPE and LPPE, with references to the actions taken as part of the official restandardisation of the Catalan language (the new 2016 Catalan spelling and grammar). The principal original contributions of our work are this analysis of a standardisation model, based on TPE and LPPE evaluation models, and an overall positive verification of the hypothesis, leading us to conclude that standardisation can be evaluated in this way.

中文翻译：

---

术语规划评估和语言政策与规划评估是否适用于标准化评估？

摘要这项有关评估标准化的初步工作试图探索在多大程度上可以以与术语规划，语言政策和规划相同的方式对标准化进行评估。探索此问题的主要原因是这种评估是必要的，尚未系统地进行。这项工作旨在验证基本假设，即术语计划评估（TPE）和语言政策与计划评估（LPPE）可以用于标准化评估。因此，解决的一般问题是根据TPE和LPPE的模型可以在多大程度上评估标准化。在介绍了豪根（Haugen）的标准化模型并用语言语料库计划和重新标准化的一些概念对其进行了补充之后，从PPE和LPPE的角度分析了该模型，并参考了加泰罗尼亚语官方标准化（新的2016年加泰罗尼亚语拼写和语法）的一部分所采取的措施。我们工作的主要原始贡献是基于TPE和LPPE评估模型对标准化模型进行的分析，以及对假设的整体肯定验证，使我们得出结论，可以以这种方式评估标准化。