当前位置: X-MOL 学术Commun. Disord. Q. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
The Comparative Efficiency of Speech Sound Interventions That Differ by Delivery Modality: Flashcards Versus Tablet
Communication Disorders Quarterly ( IF 0.7 ) Pub Date : 2019-07-03 , DOI: 10.1177/1525740119859520
Krystal L. Werfel 1 , Marren C. Brooks 1 , Lisa Fitton 1
Affiliation  

Although speech–language pathologists increasingly make use of tablets in clinical practice, little research to date has evaluated the effectiveness or efficiency of tablet use for targeting speech sound goals. The twofold purpose of this study was to compare (a) the effectiveness and (b) the efficiency of speech sound intervention using tablets versus flashcards. Four kindergarten students with at least two similar speech sound errors participated in this adapted alternating treatments single subject design study that explored the functional relation between speech sound intervention that differed by modality of delivery (tablet vs. flashcards) and increased speech sound skill in elementary school children with speech sound errors. Flashcards and tablets were both effective single-word speech sound intervention modalities; however, for three of the four participants, flashcards were more efficient than tablets.

中文翻译:

不同交付方式的语音干预的比较效率:抽认卡与平板电脑

尽管语言病理学家越来越多地在临床实践中使用平板电脑,但迄今为止很少有研究评估使用平板电脑针对语音目标的有效性或效率。本研究的双重目的是比较(a)使用平板电脑和抽认卡进行语音干预的有效性和(b)效率。四名至少有两个类似语音错误的幼儿园学生参加了这项经过调整的交替治疗单一学科设计研究,该研究探讨了因交付方式(平板电脑与抽认卡)而异的语音干预与小学语音技能提高之间的功能关系有语音错误的儿童。抽认卡和平板电脑都是有效的单字语音干预方式;然而,
更新日期:2019-07-03
down
wechat
bug