This article offers an account of the Security Council’s use of sanctions to prospectively regulate situational and systemic threats to international peace and security. It distinguishes between resolutions and specific measures within those resolutions, and assesses the Council’s regulatory strategies with regards to internal armed conflicts, the management of natural resources, and peace agreements. Drawing on insights from national (domestic) regulatory experiments, the article argues that the concept of temporality is a central feature of UN sanctions in civil conflict regimes. Using case studies on the Central African Republic and Liberia, the article explores the Council’s use of public and private regulatory strategies, the invocation of formal and informal norms, the choice of targeting state and non-state actors, and the integration of responsive regulation into contemporary sanctions practice. The article concludes by arguing that the UN Security Council has played an under-examined role in norm diffusion, and is a significant regulator of conflict and post-conflict situations.

中文翻译：

---

作为法规的联合国制裁：表 1

本文介绍了安全理事会使用制裁来前瞻性地规范对国际和平与安全的态势和系统性威胁的情况。它区分决议和这些决议中的具体措施，并评估安理会在内部武装冲突、自然资源管理和和平协议方面的监管战略。文章借鉴了国家（国内）监管实验的见解，认为时间性的概念是联合国在国内冲突制度中制裁的一个核心特征。本文通过对中非共和国和利比里亚的案例研究，探讨了理事会对公共和私人监管战略的使用、正式和非正式规范的调用、针对国家和非国家行为者的选择、以及将响应性监管纳入当代制裁实践。文章最后指出，联合国安理会在规范传播方面发挥的作用没有得到充分审视，并且是冲突和冲突后局势的重要监管者。