当前位置: X-MOL 学术Asia Pacific Law Review › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Unifying Competing Dispute Resolution Processes into a One-Stop Arbitration
Asia Pacific Law Review ( IF 1.0 ) Pub Date : 2009-12-01 , DOI: 10.1080/10192557.2009.11788216
Peter Gillies , Mona L Hymel

Abstract Whether a court should stay or alternatively refuse to stay proceedings in the court to avoid or minimise a multiplicity of proceedings – arbitral and curial – that focus on essentially the same or a related cluster of disputes, arises from time to time in domestic and international commercial arbitration situations. The parties generally want their dispute to be consolidated in the one adjudication. As a party to an arbitration agreement, this one-stop adjudication will be achieved by way of arbitration. This paper examines the responses of the courts and legislatures to this and related issues in common law jurisdictions.

中文翻译:

将竞争性争议解决流程统一为一站式仲裁

摘要 法院是否应该中止或拒绝中止法院的诉讼程序以避免或尽量减少集中在本质上相同或相关的一系列争议的仲裁和法庭诉讼程序的多样性,在国内和国际上不时出现商事仲裁情况。当事人通常希望将他们的争议合并在一个裁决中。作为仲裁协议的一方,这种一站式的裁决将通过仲裁的方式来实现。本文研究了法院和立法机关对普通法司法管辖区中的这一问题及相关问题的回应。
更新日期:2009-12-01
down
wechat
bug