This study tested a model of counseling supervisory process and outcome across two cultural contexts: one in the United States (U.S.) and one in South Korea. We hypothesized that (1) the supervisory alliance and supervisee nondisclosure would mediate the relationship between supervisor style and supervisee satisfaction and (2) the path coefficients of the model in the U.S. samples and South Korean samples would differ. Participants included 299 U.S. supervisees (mean age 30.25 years) and 334 South Korean supervisees (mean age 34.42 years), all of whom were engaged in counseling supervision. Self-reported measures were used to collect the data by using both online survey and paper–pencil survey. Results of structural equation modeling demonstrated that both the proposed model and path coefficients were statistically significant. In addition, we identified a stronger relationship between the supervisory working alliance and both supervisee nondisclosures and supervisee satisfaction in the U.S. sample in comparison to the South Korean sample. The attractive, interpersonally sensitive, and collaborative supervisory styles were differentially related to both supervisory alliance and supervisee satisfaction across U.S. and Korean samples. Implications for counseling supervision, training, and research are described.

中文翻译：

---

监督者风格可作为辅导监督关系质量和监督者满意度的预测指标：对美国和韩国被监督者的看法

这项研究测试了两种文化背景下的咨询监督过程和结果的模型：一种在美国（韩国）。我们假设（1）监督联盟和监督者的不公开将介导监督者风格和监督者满意度之间的关系，并且（2）美国样本和韩国样本中模型的路径系数会有所不同。参加者包括299名美国被监督者（平均年龄30.25岁）和334名韩国被监督者（平均年龄34.42岁），他们全部都参与了咨询监督。通过在线调查和纸铅笔调查，使用自我报告的措施来收集数据。结构方程建模的结果表明，所提出的模型和路径系数均具有统计学意义。此外，我们发现，与韩国的样本相比，美国样本中的监督工作联盟与监管未披露和监管满意度之间的关系更加牢固。在美国和韩国的样本中，有吸引力的，人际关系敏感的和协作的监督风格与监督联盟和监督满意度有差异。描述了对咨询监督，培训和研究的含义。和韩国样品。描述了对咨询监督，培训和研究的含义。和韩国样品。描述了对咨询监督，培训和研究的含义。