Hamblin distinguished between formal and descriptive dialectic. Formal normative models of deliberation dialogue have been strongly emphasized as argumentation frameworks in computer science. But making such models of deliberation applicable to real natural language examples has reached a point where the descriptive aspect needs more interdisciplinary work. The new formal and computational models of deliberation dialogue that are being built in computer science seem to be closely related to some already existing and very well established computing technologies such as problem solving and decision making, but whether or how dialectical argumentation can be helpful to support these systems remains an open question. The aim of this paper is to examine some real examples of argumentation that seem to hover on the borderlines between deliberation, problem solving and decision making.

中文翻译：

---

商议、问题解决和决策的辩证模型

汉布林区分了形式辩证法和描述辩证法。协商对话的正式规范模型作为计算机科学中的论证框架得到了强烈强调。但是，使这种审议模型适用于真实的自然语言示例已经到了描述方面需要更多跨学科工作的地步。计算机科学中正在建立的新的协商对话的正式和计算模型似乎与一些已经存在且非常成熟的计算技术密切相关，例如问题解决和决策制定，但辩证论证是否或如何有助于支持这些系统仍然是一个悬而未决的问题。本文的目的是检查一些真实的论证例子，这些例子似乎徘徊在审议之间的边界上，