The topic of the presence, legitimacy and epistemic worth of narrative explanations in different kinds of scientific discourse has already enjoyed several revivals within related discussions in contemporary philosophy of science. In fact, we have recently witnessed a more extensive, more unprejudiced and ambitious attention to narrative modes of making science. I think we need a systematic theoretical framework in order to categorize these different functions of narratives and understand their role in scientific explanatory and justificatory practice. My claim is that some distinctions and analytic tools developed within the field of contemporary Argumentation Theory might be of help.

中文翻译：

---

重新审视科学中的叙事解释：当代论证理论的一些澄清

不同类型科学话语中叙事解释的存在性、合法性和认知价值的话题已经在当代科学哲学的相关讨论中得到了几次复兴。事实上，我们最近目睹了对制作科学的叙事模式的更广泛、更公正和雄心勃勃的关注。我认为我们需要一个系统的理论框架来对叙事的这些不同功能进行分类，并理解它们在科学解释和论证实践中的作用。我的主张是，在当代论证理论领域内开发的一些区别和分析工具可能会有所帮助。