In Georgia v. Russia (I) (Just Satisfaction), the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR or Court) ordered the Russian Federation to pay Georgia EUR 10 million as reparation for Russia's “coordinated policy of arresting, detaining and expelling Georgian nationals” in the autumn of 2006 (paras. 51, 80). In so doing, the Court reaffirmed its position from Cyprus v. Turkey (IV) (Just Satisfaction) that financial compensation for non-pecuniary damage can be awarded in interstate cases. Although Georgia v. Russia (I) (Just Satisfaction) marks the development of a new line of ECtHR jurisprudence, it is unlikely that the decision will effectively prevent further mass violations of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR or Convention) by the states parties or offer fair compensation to the victims of such violations.

中文翻译：

---

格鲁吉亚诉俄罗斯案（一）（公正满意）

在格鲁吉亚诉俄罗斯 (I) (Just Satisfaction)2006 年秋季，欧洲人权法院（ECtHR 或法院）大法庭命令俄罗斯联邦向格鲁吉亚支付 1000 万欧元，作为对俄罗斯“逮捕、拘留和驱逐格鲁吉亚国民的协调政策”的赔偿（第 1 段）。 51、80）。在此过程中，法院重申了其立场塞浦路斯诉土耳其 (IV) (Just Satisfaction)在州际案件中可以判给非金钱损失的经济赔偿。虽然格鲁吉亚诉俄罗斯 (I) (Just Satisfaction)标志着欧洲人权法院新法理的发展，该决定不太可能有效防止缔约国进一步大规模违反《欧洲人权公约》（ECHR 或公约）或为此类违法行为的受害者提供公平赔偿。