In recent years, many have come to consider the right to exclude as the Punctum Archimedis that the concept of property is based upon. In the present article, I seek to re-evaluate the relations between property and exclusivity from an unusual vantage point: a comparison between two deeply-rooted legal traditions – Anglo-American law and Jewish law. For this purpose, I analyze four fundamental doctrinal differences between these two legal traditions, namely the cases of unrequested improvement, of benefiting from someone else’s property, of performing legally binding actions regarding another person’s property, and of imposing positive duties on a non-owner in favor of the owner. The different solutions that were developed by each of the legal traditions explored herein are sharply and clearly reflected in these traditions’ unique respective visions regarding notions of property and exclusivity. This article intends to bring out the latent connections between the four aforementioned test cases, tracing the threads that weave the various doctrines into coherent conceptions. Ultimately, it also places each of the two legal systems discussed as a challenging mirror image for the other, calling for fresh thinking released from fixations.

中文翻译：

---

所有权和排他性：两种愿景，两种传统

近年来，许多人开始考虑将排除权视为财产概念所基于的准点阿基米迪。在本文中，我试图从一个不同寻常的角度重新评估财产与排他性之间的关系：比较两个根深蒂固的法律传统——英美法和犹太法。为此，我分析了这两种法律传统之间的四个基本教义差异，即未经请求的改进、从他人的财产中受益、对他人的财产采取具有法律约束力的行动以及对非所有者施加积极义务的情况。赞成业主。此处探讨的每个法律传统所开发的不同解决方案都清晰地反映在这些传统关于财产和排他性概念的各自独特的视野中。本文旨在揭示上述四个测试用例之间的潜在联系，追踪将各种教义编织成连贯概念的线索。最终，它还将所讨论的两个法律体系中的每一个都作为另一个具有挑战性的镜像，要求从固定中释放新的思维。