当前位置: X-MOL 学术Soc. Just. Res. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Observer Sensitivity and Early Radicalization to Violence Among Young People in Germany
Social Justice Research ( IF 1.6 ) Pub Date : 2020-02-19 , DOI: 10.1007/s11211-020-00351-y
Sara Jahnke , Carl Philipp Schröder , Laura-Romina Goede , Lena Lehmann , Luisa Hauff , Andreas Beelmann

Personal sensitivity to injustice from either a victim or an observer perspective shapes political attitudes and actions. Yet, little is known about the link between justice sensitivity, particularly from an observer perspective, and early radicalization. We investigate the hypotheses that victim and observer sensitivity are differentially linked to political orientation and early radicalization outcomes among adolescents and young adults. We assessed political orientations, justice sensitivity, and early radicalization (as attitudes or intentions regarding illegal/violent political strategies) among 303 young activists (Study 1) and 3715 ninth graders (Study 2). Across both studies, observer sensitivity was linked to stronger left-wing orientations, while victim sensitivity predicted stronger right-wing orientations. Yet, findings with respect to early radicalization outcomes were mixed: Among young adult activists in Study 1, observer (but not victim) justice sensitivity positively predicted both legal activism intentions and radicalization. Among ninth graders in Study 2, on the other hand, general and right-wing radicalization were negatively associated with observer sensitivity and positively associated with victim sensitivity. The results indicate that the link between observer sensitivity and early radicalization can be positive or negative depending on the age of the sample and the political context. We discuss potential reasons for the conflicting results, as well as limitations and implications for future research.

中文翻译:

德国年轻人对暴力的观察力敏感性和早期激进化

从受害者或观察者的角度来看,个人对不公正的敏感性决定了政治态度和行为。然而,人们对司法敏感性(尤其是从观察者的角度来看)与早期激进之间的联系知之甚少。我们调查的假设是,受害人和观察者的敏感性与青少年和年轻人之间的政治倾向和早期激进结果有不同的联系。我们评估了303名年轻活动家(研究1)和3715年级的9年级学生(研究2)的政治倾向,司法敏感性和早期激进(作为对非法/暴力政治策略的态度或意图)。在这两项研究中,观察者的敏感性与更强的左翼取向有关,而受害者的敏感性则预示着更强的右翼取向。然而,关于早期激进结果的发现参差不齐:在研究1中的年轻成年激进主义者中,观察者(而非受害者)的司法敏感性积极地预测了法律激进主义的意图和激进。另一方面,在研究2的九年级学生中,普遍和右翼激进与观察者的敏感性呈负相关,与受害者的敏感性呈正相关。结果表明,观察者的敏感性与早期激进之间的联系可能是正面还是负面的,具体取决于样本的年龄和政治背景。我们讨论了产生矛盾结果的潜在原因,以及对未来研究的局限性和启示。观察者(而非受害者)的司法敏感性积极地预测了法律行动主义的意图和激进主义。另一方面,在研究2的九年级学生中,一般和右翼激进与观察者的敏感性呈负相关,与受害者的敏感性呈正相关。结果表明,观察者的敏感性与早期激进之间的联系可能是正面还是负面的,具体取决于样本的年龄和政治背景。我们讨论了产生矛盾结果的潜在原因,以及对未来研究的局限性和启示。观察者(而非受害者)的司法敏感性积极地预测了法律行动主义的意图和激进主义。另一方面,在研究2的九年级学生中,一般和右翼激进与观察者的敏感性呈负相关,与受害者的敏感性呈正相关。结果表明,观察者的敏感性与早期激进之间的联系可能是正面还是负面的,具体取决于样本的年龄和政治背景。我们讨论了产生矛盾结果的潜在原因,以及对未来研究的局限性和启示。结果表明,观察者的敏感性与早期激进之间的联系可能是正面还是负面的,具体取决于样本的年龄和政治背景。我们讨论了产生矛盾结果的潜在原因,以及对未来研究的局限性和启示。结果表明,观察者的敏感性与早期激进之间的联系可能是正面还是负面的,具体取决于样本的年龄和政治背景。我们讨论了产生矛盾结果的潜在原因,以及对未来研究的局限性和启示。
更新日期:2020-02-19
down
wechat
bug