ABSTRACT

This rejoinder addresses concerns raised by Panagopoulos and van der Linden about replication studies of their work conducted by Matland and Murray and published in this journal.Specifically, it offers counterarguments grounded in a broader view of the evidence to the assertion and findings that watching eyes stimuli more effectively mobilize Republican/conservative identifiers to vote than Democratic/liberal identifiers. It concludes that the overall evidence generated by the original and replication research is inconclusive at best.

中文翻译：

---

观察眼睛和党派动员：与Panagopoulos和van der Linden的重聚

摘要

这项重新结合解决了Panagopoulos和van der Linden对Matland和Murray进行的复制研究的关注，并发表在本杂志上。比民主/自由主义的标识符更有效地动员共和党/保守派的标识符进行投票。结论是，原始和复制研究产生的总体证据充其量是不确定的。