In recent years I have become interested in Bion and neo-Bionian field theory, but the origin of my interest in dreaming does not lie in scholarly or clinical sources. The source of the idea of the dream sense is my own experience. After addressing that point, I reject what appears to be Colombo’s impression (this issue) that detailed inquiry is necessarily the basis of interpersonal and relational clinical practice, and then take issue with Brown’s understanding of expressive participation in relational thinking (this issue). Responding to Brown’s wish that I offer more detail about my own clinical process, I present an overview of my understanding of the way I work. I conclude by addressing the understandings offered by the discussants of symmetry in the analytic relationship, and offering more details of my own.

近年来，我对比昂和新比昂的场论产生了兴趣，但是我对做梦的兴趣并非来自学术或临床研究。梦sense以求的想法是我自己的经历。在解决了这一点之后，我拒绝了科伦坡的印象（此问题），即详细询问必定是人际和关系临床实践的基础，然后对布朗对表达性参与关系思维的理解提出质疑（此问题）。为了满足布朗希望我提供有关自己的临床过程的更多细节的愿望，我概述了我对自己的工作方式的理解。最后，我将讨论对称性讨论者在解析关系中提供的理解，并提供我自己的更多细节。