We examined the accuracy of judgments of three dispositions toward ridicule and being laughed at in two thin slices studies. Participants (N_1/2 = 218/132) provided short written self-descriptions (Study 2 also included diary data across 14 days). In each study, ten judges provided their impressions of the targets’ dispositions based on targets’ written self-descriptions. Computerized text analyses provided information on the presence and use of linguistic cues. We found robust self-other agreement on the single dispositions (r ≥ 0.19) and profiles (r ≥ 0.18), robust consensus among judges (ICC ≥ 0.39), and the expected low correlations with the behavioral criterion (r ≥ 0.06). How people deal with ridicule and being laughed at can be well perceived from minimal personal information.

我们在两个薄片研究中检验了三种对嘲笑和被嘲笑倾向的判断的准确性。参与者（N _1/2  = 218/132）提供了简短的书面自我描述（研究2还包括14天的日记数据）。在每个研究中，十名法官根据目标的书面自我描述对目标的性格印象。计算机文本分析提供了有关语言提示的存在和使用的信息。我们发现在单一处置（鲁棒自其他协议[R  ≥0.19）和型材（[R  ≥0.18），评委们一致稳健（ICC≥0.39），并与行为准则的预期低相关性（[R ≥0.06）。人们从最少的个人信息中就能很好地理解人们如何处理嘲笑和被嘲笑。