Men have an important role as allies in reducing discrimination against women. Following the Social Identity Model of Collective Action (SIMCA), we examined whether men's identification with women would predict their allied collective action, alongside moral convictions, efficacy, and anger. We also examined whether identification with their own ingroup would decrease their willingness to improve women's situation. We tested the SIMCA, extended to consider ingroup identification among men, in Japan (N = 103) and the Philippines (N = 131). Consistent with the SIMCA, moral convictions and group efficacy predicted men's willingness to engage in collective action to fight discrimination against women. However, anger was not significant, and identification with the advantaged and disadvantaged groups played different roles in the two countries. We discuss the possible role of norms and legitimacy in society in explaining the pattern of results.

中文翻译：

---

动员人员：日本和菲律宾的盟友身份和集体行动

在减少对妇女的歧视方面，男人作为盟友可以发挥重要作用。遵循集体行动的社会认同模型（SIMCA），我们研究了男性与女性的认同是否可以预测其同盟的集体行动以及道德信念，效力和愤怒。我们还研究了与自己的群体中的认同是否会降低她们改善妇女状况的意愿。我们在日本（N = 103）和菲律宾（N = 131）对SIMCA进行了测试，以考虑男性之间的群体内认同。与SIMCA一致，道德信念和团体效力预示着男人愿意采取集体行动来打击对妇女的歧视。但是，愤怒并不严重，在这两个国家中，与优劣势群体的认同起着不同的作用。我们讨论了规范和合法性在社会中解释结果模式的可能作用。