Objectives: To examine the factor structure and psychometrics of a new self-report scale measuring cognitive and behavioral reactions to goal achievement (Reactions to Goal Achievement Scale; RGAS), and to examine its relationship to other measures of clinical perfectionism in two samples. Self-reported reasons for setting higher standards following successful goal achievement were also examined. Methods: The RGAS, Clinical Perfectionism Questionnaire (CPQ) and Frost Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale (FMPS) were administered to a sample on Amazon Mechanical Turk (N = 264) and to a sample of overweight individuals (N = 65). Results: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses suggested two factors, entitled dissatisfaction with success (DS) and increase in standards (IS). The RGAS was associated with subscales of the CPQ and FMPS. In addition, participants indicated many reasons for setting higher standards following success. Conclusion: The RGAS is a new instrument for measuring both cognitive and behavioral responses to success in clinical perfectionism. Setting higher standards may not be an indication of perfectionism, as there appear to be many reasons people set higher standards.

中文翻译：

---

临床完美主义，对标准的不满和提高标准：对目标成就量表的反应的验证

目的：研究一种新的自我报告量表的因子结构和心理计量学，该量表用于测量对目标达成的认知和行为反应（对目标成就量表的反应； RGAS），并在两个样本中检验其与临床完美主义其他度量的关系。成功完成目标后，自我报告设定更高标准的原因也得到了研究。方法：将RGAS，临床完美主义问卷（CPQ）和弗罗斯特多维完美主义量表（FMPS）应用于Amazon Mechanical Turk上的样本（N = 264）和超重个体的样本（N = 65）。结果：探索性和验证性因素分析建议了两个因素，分别是对成功的不满意（DS）和标准的提高（IS）。RGAS与CPQ和FMPS的分量表相关。此外，参与者指出了成功之后制定更高标准的许多原因。结论：RGAS是一种用于测量对临床完美主义成功的认知和行为反应的新工具。设定更高的标准可能并不表示完美主义，因为人们设定更高的标准似乎有很多原因。