This article examined the psychometric properties and validity of a new self-report instrument for assessing the social norms that coordinate social relations and define self-worth within three normative systems. A survey that assesses endorsement of honor, face, and dignity norms was evaluated in ethnically diverse adolescent samples in the U.S. (Study 1a) and Canada (Study 2). The internal structure of the survey was consistent with the conceptual framework, but only the honor and face scales were reliable. Honor endorsement was linked to self-reported retaliation, less conciliatory behavior, and high perceived threat. Face endorsement was related to anger suppression, more conciliatory behavior, and, in the U.S., low perceived threat. Study 1b examined identity-relevant emotions and appraisals experienced after retaliation and after calming a victimized peer. Honor norm endorsement predicted pride following revenge, while face endorsement predicted high shame. Adolescents who endorsed honor norms thought that only avenging their peer had been helpful and consistent with the role of good friend, while those who endorsed face norms thought only calming a victimized peer was helpful and indicative of a good friend. Implications for adolescent welfare are discussed.

本文研究了一种新的自我报告工具的心理计量特性和有效性，该工具用于评估在三个规范系统中协调社会关系并定义自我价值的社会规范。在美国（研究1a）和加拿大（研究2）的不同种族的青少年样本中，评估了一项评估对荣誉，面孔和尊严准则的认可的调查。调查的内部结构与概念框架一致，但是只有荣誉和面孔比例是可靠的。荣誉背书与自我报告的报复，较少的和解行为以及较高的感知威胁有关。脸部认可与抑制愤怒，更和解的行为以及在美国的低感知威胁有关。研究1b研究了报复后和使受害同伴平静下来后经历的与身份相关的情绪和评估。荣誉背书预示着复仇后的自尊心，而面孔背书则预示了耻辱。认可荣誉准则的青少年认为，只有向同龄人报仇才是有益的，并且与好朋友的角色相一致；而那些赞成面子准则的青少年则认为，仅使受害的同龄人平静下来是有帮助的，并表示好朋友。讨论了对青少年福利的影响。而那些支持面子规范的人则认为，只有让受害的同龄人平静下来是有帮助的，并表明是一个好朋友。讨论了对青少年福利的影响。而那些支持面子规范的人则认为，只有让受害的同龄人平静下来是有帮助的，并表明是一个好朋友。讨论了对青少年福利的影响。