ABSTRACT

We developed a 40-item situational judgment test (R-SJT) to capture resilience in context. The scoring key was developed using a crowd-sourcing method (N = 100) and pilot-tested (N = 62). A new sample (N = 208) was used to investigate validity of the R-SJT scores. The R-SJT scores demonstrated acceptable levels of internal consistency, convergent validity, and evidence of better discriminant and criterion-related validity, compared to three Likert-type resilience measures. Scores on the R-SJT moderately correlated with the three resilience scales and personality measures including hardiness, negative affect, agreeableness, conscientiousness, and neuroticism. The R-SJT showed incremental validity beyond traditional resilience measures and personality for criterion measures of psychological adjustment (i.e., depression, anxiety, and stress). The R-SJT appears to be a viable instrument to measure resilience.

摘要

我们开发了40个项目的情境判断测试（R-SJT）来捕捉环境中的应变能力。使用众包方法（N = 100）开发了计分密钥，并进行了试点测试（N = 62）。一个新样本（N= 208）用于调查R-SJT分数的有效性。与三种李克特型复原力衡量相比，R-SJT分数显示出内部一致性，收敛效度的可接受水平，以及更好的判别和与标准相关的效度的证据。R-SJT的分数与三种韧性量表和性格测度适度相关，包括韧性，负面影响，和agree，尽责和神经质。R-SJT表现出超出传统的弹性测量和人格水平的心理调节标准测量值（即抑郁，焦虑和压力）的增加的有效性。R-SJT似乎是衡量弹性的可行工具。