To what extent does religious identification promote collective efficacy and perceived injustice that contribute to explain support for interreligious violence in Indonesia? This overarching research question is inspired by theoretical insights starting from social identity theory, and noticeably enriched by collective action theories. We use high‐quality data of 1,995 randomly selected individuals (Muslims and Christians) from across the Indonesian archipelago to investigate the mediating effects of perceived injustice and collective efficacy on the relationship between religiosity and support for interreligious violence. We also improve upon previous research with an elaborate measure of religiosity (beliefs, practice, and salience). Our structural equation modelling analysis reveals that collective efficacy significantly mediates the relationship between the religiosity dimensions and support for interreligious violence. Moreover, on average, the Muslim community has a higher level of collective efficacy, as compared to the Christian community, which positively affects the relationship between most religiosity dimensions and support for interreligious violence. An interesting finding is that in the Christian community, salience is overall negatively related to collective efficacy, which then negatively affects support for interreligious violence. These results provide novel empirical insights on the role of religious identity in interreligious conflicts in the South Asian context, especially Indonesia.

中文翻译：

---

集体行动的社会认同模型在预测印度尼西亚对宗教间暴力的支持中的适用性

宗教认同在多大程度上促进了集体效力和人们认为的不公正，从而有助于解释对印度尼西亚宗教间暴力的支持？这个首要的研究问题受到社会认同理论的理论启发，并被集体行动理论所丰富。我们使用来自印度尼西亚群岛的1,995名随机选择的个体（穆斯林和基督教徒）的高质量数据，调查了感知上的不公正和集体效力对宗教与宗教间暴力之间关系的中介作用。我们还通过对宗教信仰（信仰，实践和显着性）的详尽衡量来改进先前的研究。我们的结构方程模型分析表明，集体效能显着调解了宗教维度与宗教间暴力支持之间的关系。此外，平均而言，与基督教社区相比，穆斯林社区的集体效能更高，这对大多数宗教信仰层面与支持宗教间暴力之间的关系产生了积极影响。一个有趣的发现是，在基督徒社区中，显着性总体上与集体效能负相关，而负面影响对宗教间暴力的支持。这些结果提供了关于宗教身份在南亚背景下，特别是印度尼西亚的宗教间冲突中的作用的新颖的经验性见解。