当前位置: X-MOL 学术WIREs Clim. Chang. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Review of tropical cyclones in the Australian region: Climatology, variability, predictability, and trends
WIREs Climate Change ( IF 9.2 ) Pub Date : 2020-12-16 , DOI: 10.1002/wcc.686


In Chand et al. (2019), the errors were published on page 3, Figure 3, and Figure 5. The revised changes do not affect any discussions or conclusions in the original article.

On page 3 of the article, the following statement was made:

“Note, unlike Atlantic and North Pacific basins, there is no in situ data included in the intensity estimates for the Australian basin…”

We recognise that even though very rare, in situ information do get used occasionally (when available) to adjust Australian TC intensity estimates, for example, with the cases of severe TCs Vance (March 1999) and George (March 2007). Thus, we have revised the statement and it should now read as follows:

“Note, unlike Atlantic and North Pacific basins, very little in situ data are included in the intensity estimates for the Australian basin...”

In Figure 3b in the original article displayed only the first landfall locations of TCs that achieved severe (red) and nonsevere (black) status. The following corrected figure now includes locations for cases of TCs that made multiple landfalls.

image
FIGURE 3b
Open in figure viewerPowerPoint
(Corrected version) Locations of TCs that achieved severe (red) and nonsevere (black) status upon landfall. Note multiple landfall locations by a single TC are included in this figure
image
FIGURE 5
Open in figure viewerPowerPoint
(corrected version) (a) Year‐to‐year variability of the seasonal number of Australian tropical cyclones (TCs) (blue) and severe TCs (red), and average number of TCs per decade in 1° × 1° grid boxes for (b) all‐year‐climatology over the Australian region, as well as for (c) El Niño, (d) neutral, and (e) La Niña events in the Southern Hemisphere over the period 1981/1982 to 2016/2017 cyclone seasons. IBTrACS TC data were used to construct these figures, and the El Niňo–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) classification is based on Niño 3.4 SST anomalies >0.5 °C for El Niño and <−0.5 °C for La Niña using September to February averages. The number of TCs in (a) is based on systems equatorward of 250S with central pressure < 995 hPa. Asterisks in (a) denote El Niño years while plus signs denote La Niña years; unmarked years are ENSO neutral

On Figure 5, the image was revised as panels c‐e were previously produced using 0.33°C magnitude thresholds of Niño 3.4 SST anomalies, instead of 0.5°C thresholds as intended. Although there is no single agreed threshold for defining ENSO phases, thresholds of >0.5°C for El Niño and <−0.5°C for La Niña are now used for the revised figure as shown below. A typographical correction was also made to the x‐axis label in panel a.

We apologize for these errors.



中文翻译:

澳大利亚地区热带气旋的回顾:气候学,变异性,可预测性和趋势

在钱德等。(2019年),错误已发布在第3页,图3和图5上。修订后的更改不影响原始文章中的任何讨论或结论。

在本文的第3页,进行了以下声明:

“请注意,与大西洋和北太平洋盆地不同,澳大利亚盆地的强度估算中没有包含原位数据……”

我们认识到,尽管非常罕见,但偶尔会使用现场信息(如果有的话)来调整澳大利亚的TC强度估算值,例如,在严重TC的Vance(1999年3月)和George(2007年3月)的情况下。因此,我们修改了该声明,现在应改为:

“请注意,与大西洋和北太平洋盆地不同,澳大利亚盆地的强度估算中很少包含原位数据……”

在原始文章的图3b中,仅显示达到严重(红色)和不严重(黑色)状态的TC的第一个登陆位置。现在,以下更正后的数字包括发生多次登陆的TC案例的位置。

图片
图3b
在图形查看器中打开微软幻灯片软件
(更正版)在登陆时达到严重(红色)和不严重(黑色)状态的TC的位置。请注意,此图中包含一个TC的多个登陆位置
图片
图5
在图形查看器中打开微软幻灯片软件
(更正后的版本)(a)澳大利亚热带气旋(TC)(蓝色)和严重TC(红色)的季节性数量的逐年变化,以及1°×1°网格箱中每十年的平均TC数量(b)整个澳大利亚地区的全年气候,以及(c)1981/1982年至2016/2017年期间南半球的厄尔尼诺现象,(d)中性事件和(e)拉尼娜事件季节。IBTrACS TC数据用于构建这些数字,而ElNiño-南方涛动(ENSO)分类基于Niño3.4 SST异常(对于ElNiño> 0.5°C,对于LaNiña<-0.5°C),使用9月至2月的平均值。(a)中的TC数量基于系统赤道25 0S,中心压力<995 hPa。(a)中的星号表示厄尔尼诺年份,加号表示拉尼娜年份;没有标记的年份对ENSO是中性的

在图5上,图像被修改为先前使用Niño3.4 SST异常的0.33°C幅值阈值而不是预期的0.5°C阈值生成的面板c-e。尽管没有统一的阈值来定义ENSO相,但现在将修订的数字使用的阈值用于ElNiño> 0.5°C和用于LaNiña的<-0.5°C。还对面板a中的x轴标签进行了印刷校正。

对于这些错误,我们深表歉意。

更新日期:2020-12-17
down
wechat
bug