In Chand et al. (2019), the errors were published on page 3, Figure 3, and Figure 5. The revised changes do not affect any discussions or conclusions in the original article.
On page 3 of the article, the following statement was made:
“Note, unlike Atlantic and North Pacific basins, there is no in situ data included in the intensity estimates for the Australian basin…”
We recognise that even though very rare, in situ information do get used occasionally (when available) to adjust Australian TC intensity estimates, for example, with the cases of severe TCs Vance (March 1999) and George (March 2007). Thus, we have revised the statement and it should now read as follows:
“Note, unlike Atlantic and North Pacific basins, very little in situ data are included in the intensity estimates for the Australian basin...”
In Figure 3b in the original article displayed only the first landfall locations of TCs that achieved severe (red) and nonsevere (black) status. The following corrected figure now includes locations for cases of TCs that made multiple landfalls.
On Figure 5, the image was revised as panels c‐e were previously produced using 0.33°C magnitude thresholds of Niño 3.4 SST anomalies, instead of 0.5°C thresholds as intended. Although there is no single agreed threshold for defining ENSO phases, thresholds of >0.5°C for El Niño and <−0.5°C for La Niña are now used for the revised figure as shown below. A typographical correction was also made to the x‐axis label in panel a.