Employing Reid and Frisby’s feminist participatory action research model (FPAR) as a guide, men from diverse ethno-cultural backgrounds worked with women leaders to take action on the issue of intimate partner violence. Engaging with four interconnected phases, the research team adopted shared roles of leadership which led to 29 collective actions. Through trust-building dialogues, we interrogated issues related to masculinity, gender equity, anti-racism, and decolonization. A “collective cultures approach” to men’s violence prevention work was articulated and a grassroots movement emerged. As white women situated in both academic and community spaces, we discuss knowledges, actions, and learnings from this FPAR process, underscoring the tensions and contradictions of employing FPAR in real-life contexts. The importance and limitations of inter-relational reflexivity and power accountability are emphasized as a core tenet of FPAR.

以里德和弗里斯比（Reid and Frisby）的女权主义参与式行动研究模型（FPAR）为指导，来自不同种族文化背景的男性与女性领导人一起对亲密伴侣暴力问题采取了行动。在四个相互关联的阶段中，研究团队采用了共同的领导角色，导致了29项集体行动。通过建立信任的对话，我们审问了与男子气概，性别平等，反种族主义和非殖民化有关的问题。阐明了一项针对男性暴力预防工作的“集体文化方针”，并出现了基层运动。作为学术界和社区中的白人妇女，我们讨论了这一FPAR过程中的知识，行动和学习，着重强调了在现实生活中采用FPAR的压力和矛盾。