ABSTRACT

I consider the Doerig, Schruger, Herzog (this issue) paper to be a very important paper on the multiple empirical theories of consciousness (ToCs). The paper compared 13 different approaches. It would be wonderful to create a forum for all interested parties to discuss the many issues this paper brought up. Equally important is what the paper didn’t bring up. Namely, how do the different empirical approaches connect to qualia, the subjective aspects of consciousness. In my mind, qualia is the biggest mystery facing present science. It would be good to see how the multiple interpretations might connect to qualia.

中文翻译：

---

建议创建讨论论坛以考虑关于意识理论的证据

摘要

我认为 Doerig、Schruger、Herzog（本期）的论文是关于意识的多种经验理论 (ToCs) 的非常重要的论文。该论文比较了 13 种不同的方法。为所有感兴趣的各方创建一个论坛来讨论本文提出的许多问题将是非常棒的。同样重要的是论文没有提到的内容。也就是说，不同的经验方法如何与 qualia（意识的主观方面）联系起来。在我看来，感受质是当前科学面临的最大谜团。很高兴看到多种解释如何与感受质相关。