Frameworks such as Direct Manipulation or Instrumental Interaction have been an important force in HCI research. Evaluating the impact of frameworks can identify whether and how a framework was used, how it has evolved, and what trends have developed over time. However, studying the impact of such theoretical contributions requires consideration of various perspectives and level of impact. As a case study for investigating the impact of theoretical work in HCI, we present our evaluation of the impact of the Reality Based Interaction (RBI) framework, introduced by the authors in 2008. We provide our findings about the impact of the framework both on contemporary research, through content-based citation analysis, and in HCI education, through a survey we conducted on emerging interaction frameworks. The article contributes a comprehensive methodology for evaluating the impact of frameworks through our twofold approach: content-based citation analysis, including the design of a new citation typology; and a survey on the use of frameworks in education using a taxonomy of learning goals. We also consider the role of frameworks in HCI as well as the future of the RBI framework.

中文翻译：

---

基于现实的交互的现实

直接操作或仪器交互等框架一直是 HCI 研究的重要力量。评估框架的影响可以确定是否以及如何使用框架，它是如何演变的，以及随着时间的推移发展了哪些趋势。然而，研究这些理论贡献的影响需要考虑各种观点和影响程度。作为调查 HCI 中理论工作影响的案例研究，我们对作者在 2008 年引入的基于现实的交互 (RBI) 框架的影响进行了评估。我们提供了关于该框架对当代研究，通过基于内容的引文分析，在 HCI 教育中，通过我们对新兴交互框架进行的一项调查。本文通过我们的双重方法提供了一种评估框架影响的综合方法：基于内容的引文分析，包括新引文类型的设计；以及使用学习目标分类法在教育中使用框架的调查。我们还考虑了框架在 HCI 中的作用以及 RBI 框架的未来。