While organizing the submission evaluation process for the SIGMOD 2019 research track, we aim at maximizing the value of the reviews while minimizing the probability of misunderstandings due to factual errors, thereby valorizing impactful ideas. The objective is an educating and rewarding experience for both the authors and the reviewers. The actionable goals are: 1. Maximize review depth and breadth. For depth, optimizing the assignment of papers to reviewers is of key importance; "low confidence" reviews should be few to none, in order for reviewers to provide extensive and useful comments to the authors. To cover the breadth and to address controversial issues, recruit as many reviewers as needed to converge to a unanimous set of comments. 2. Ensure that all submissions are treated equally fairly by experts in the respective domains. 3. Obtain as much input from the authors as possible during the process. Enabling author feedback is the key step in the process. 4. Allow re-evaluation of papers with non-critical flaws through revisions.

中文翻译：

---

SIGMOD 2019 研究跟踪审查系统

在组织 SIGMOD 2019 研究轨道的提交评估过程时，我们旨在最大限度地提高评论的价值，同时最大限度地减少因事实错误而导致误解的可能性，从而使有影响力的想法更加有价值。目标是为作者和审稿人提供教育和有益的体验。可操作的目标是： 1. 最大化审查深度和广度。就深度而言，优化论文给审稿人的分配至关重要。“低置信度”的评论应该很少甚至没有，以便评论者向作者提供广泛而有用的评论。为了覆盖广度并解决有争议的问题，请根据需要招募尽可能多的审稿人，以形成一组一致的评论。2. 确保各个领域的专家平等对待所有提交的内容。3. 在此过程中尽可能多地从作者那里获得输入。启用作者反馈是该过程中的关键步骤。4.允许通过修改重新评估具有非关键缺陷的论文。