当前位置: X-MOL 学术Minds Mach. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
In Defence of a Reciprocal Turing Test
Minds and Machines ( IF 4.2 ) Pub Date : 2020-12-01 , DOI: 10.1007/s11023-020-09552-5
Fintan Mallory

The traditional Turing test appeals to an interrogator's judgement to determine whether or not their interlocutor is an intelligent agent. This paper argues that this kind of asymmetric experimental set-up is inappropriate for tracking a property such as intelligence because intelligence is grounded in part by symmetric relations of recognition between agents. In place, it proposes a reciprocal test which takes into account the judgments of both interrogators and competitors to determine if an agent is intelligent. This form of social interaction better tracks both the evolution of natural intelligence and how the concept of intelligence is actually used within our society. This new test is defended against the criticisms that a proof of intelligence requires a demonstration of self-consciousness and that semantic externalism entails that a non-embodied Turing test is inadequate.

中文翻译:

为互惠图​​灵测试辩护

传统的图灵测试求助于审讯者的判断,以确定他们的对话者是否是一个智能代理。本文认为,这种非对称实验设置不适用于跟踪智能等属性,因为智能部分基于代理之间的对称识别关系。实际上,它提出了一种相互测试,该测试考虑了询问者和竞争者的判断,以确定代理是否聪明。这种社交互动形式更好地跟踪了自然智能的演变以及智能概念在我们社会中的实际使用情况。
更新日期:2020-12-01
down
wechat
bug