Plagiarism is viewed as a critical issue that can hinder the development of creativity and innovation in Indonesia. Thus, since the early 2000s the Indonesian government has endeavoured to develop policies to address this issue. In response to national policy, Indonesian educational institutions have made serious institutional efforts to address the plagiarism issue. Research in the Indonesian Higher education context on plagiarism has focussed on reporting prevention and mitigation efforts. However, little has been discussed about the communication of these efforts in policy across the different institutional levels of Indonesian Higher Education. This study aims at exploring the anti-plagiarism efforts by determining the main features (or discourses) reflected in plagiarism policy in Indonesian HE from national to institutional level. Two web-based resources namely the official website of The General Directorate of Research, Technology and Higher Education (retrieved 2015), and the website of Bandung Institute of Technology (retrieved 2015) were used to ascertain the most appropriate policies to include in the study. Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) was used to reach explanatory understanding of how the policies (discursive events) demonstrate through their linguistic repetitions and other forms intertextuality, their relative positions within the Indonesian Higher Education institutional hierarchy and consequently provide some insight into the social practices and understandings of plagiarism underlying the creation of the documents. This study revealed that perhaps because of the rigid boundaries and hierarchies represented between the documents, the university policy does not show much transformation from the documents at a Ministry level, hence the definition of plagiarism remains broad and the levels of plagiarism and sanctions for plagiarism remain undefined. This can potentially lead to inconsistencies in developing effective practices preventing plagiarism.

中文翻译：

---

从of窃政策的角度了解印度尼西亚的窃：大学课程

窃被视为可能阻碍印度尼西亚创造力和创新发展的关键问题。因此，自2000年代初以来，印度尼西亚政府一直在努力制定解决这一问题的政策。为了响应国家政策，印度尼西亚的教育机构为解决the窃问题做出了认真的体制努力。在印度尼西亚高等教育中，有关窃的研究重点是报告预防和缓解措施。但是，关于这些努力在印尼高等教育不同机构级别上的政策交流的讨论很少。这项研究旨在通过确定印尼高等教育从国家到机构层面的窃政策所体现的主要特征（或话语），来探索反efforts窃的努力。研究，技术和高等教育总局的官方网站（2015年检索）和万隆理工学院的网站（2015年检索）这两个基于网络的资源用于确定最合适的政策以纳入研究。批判性话语分析（CDA）用于对政策（话语事件）如何通过语言重复和其他形式的互文性进行展示，以解释其在印尼高等教育机构层次结构中的相对位置，从而提供对社会实践和社会实践的一些见解。对the窃的理解是创建文件的基础。这项研究表明，也许是由于文档之间存在严格的界限和层次结构，大学政策并未从部级文件中显示出很大的转变，因此of窃的定义仍然很宽泛，and窃的水平和对窃的制裁仍然不确定。这有可能导致在开发防止抄袭的有效实践中出现不一致之处。