当前位置: X-MOL 学术China-EU Law Journal › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
The right to an effective remedy in European law: significance, content and interaction
China-EU Law Journal ( IF 0.3 ) Pub Date : 2019-09-16 , DOI: 10.1007/s12689-019-00086-3
Wojciech Piątek

One of the basic rights and a general principle of the European Union is the right to an effective remedy. In the paper is presented the basis of the right to an effective remedy derived from the first paragraph of Article 47. The right could be realized only before a tribunal which is an extraordinary public authority competent to adjudicate civil, criminal and administrative cases. The effectiveness of a remedy manifests itself in the sense of preventing the alleged violation of law or its continuation, or in providing adequate redress for any violation that had already occurred. The standard of the right to an effective remedy is fulfilled in all EU Member States differently. As an example in the paper was presented interactions between above mentioned standards and polish legal system in the area of administrative judiciary.



中文翻译:

欧洲法中的有效补救权:意义、内容和互动

欧盟的基本权利和一般原则之一是获得有效补救的权利。文件提出了源自第 47 条第一款的有效补救权的基础。该权利只能在法庭上实现,而法庭是有权裁决民事、刑事和行政案件的特别公共当局。补救措施的有效性体现在防止被指控的违法行为或违法行为的继续,或者为已经发生的任何违法行为提供充分的补救。所有欧盟成员国都以不同方式实现有效补救权的标准。本文举例介绍了上述标准与波兰法律体系在行政司法领域的相互作用。

更新日期:2019-09-16
down
wechat
bug