This paper seeks to provide further evidence about ‘league table’ orderings for deprivation in local areas, especially for two domains – employment and education – which seem likely to be closely related. Rather than relying solely on administrative Local Authority areas and functional economic areas, our focus is to refine the concentric banding approach introduced in Nolan et al. (Local Economy 27(4): 403–418, 2012), and to apply it throughout England. We also introduce two new procedures by which areas might be systematically split into smaller components. The spatial distributions of employment and education deprivation turn out to be quite different (and distinct from the spatial distribution of overall deprivation). Throughout, there is clear evidence that it matters what size of local area is considered.

中文翻译：

---

排行榜和同心环：2010年多重剥夺指数的就业和教育领域有多相似？

本文力求提供更多证据，证明在当地，特别是在就业和教育这两个领域中，可能造成密切联系的“联盟桌”秩序在当地被剥夺。我们的重点不是改进仅依靠行政管理的地方当局地区和功能性经济领域，而是完善Nolan等人引入的同心分带方法。（地方经济27（4）：403–418，2012），并将其应用于整个英格兰。我们还介绍了两个新程序，通过这些程序可以将区域系统地划分为较小的部分。就业和教育匮乏的空间分布被证明是完全不同的（并且不同于整体贫困的空间分布）。在整个过程中，有明确的证据表明考虑什么大小的本地区域至关重要。