The question of whether Heidegger’s phenomenological contribution to the philosophy of being originates from his pre-philosophical attitude to theology or rather, it is the methodological question of phenomenology which influenced his thinking, is one of the most essential questions in Heidegger-research. Though, this has already been elaborated on in a broader sense, the publication of the Black Notes has opened new dimensions for discussion. It is not the aim of this paper to represent Heidegger’s concept of the history of being in the light of the new debates, but rather to confirm the thesis, that, in spite of the ‘turn’; in Heidegger’s thinking, his phenomenological hermeneutics was inspired, above all, by his reflection on Christianity. Moreover, the paper will question whether the linearity of Heidegger’s thinking about the historical being remains on the horizon of the religious phenomenon, as it is thematized in his early papers and lectures. While Heidegger’s early phenomenological approaches to religion and theology have been sufficiently elaborated on by several authors, and the phenomenological–hermeneutical relevance has been proven in his thinking, the linkage between the early philosophical approaches to the problem of religiosity and of historical being arising newly in Heidegger’s thinking from the 1930s is missing. The present paper will not just refer to the thesis that Heidegger’s theological background contributed to his questioning of being, and that it was influenced in different ways, but makes an attempt to reveal the internal dynamics of Heidegger’s early thinking prior to the publication of Being and Time and the time of composing the Contributions to Philosophy of those of Heidegger’s lectures which remain in the parallel analysis of religiosity and historicity.

中文翻译：

---

海德格尔对现实的阐释中的历史性与宗教性：展望阿道夫·赖纳赫对海德格尔现象学概念的贡献

海德格尔对存在哲学的现象学贡献是否源于他对神学的前哲学态度，或者更确切地说，是现象学的方法论问题影响了他的思想，是海德格尔研究中最本质的问题之一。虽然这已经在更广泛的意义上进行了阐述，但黑色笔记的出版为讨论开辟了新的维度。本文的目的不是要在新的辩论中代表海德格尔关于存在史的概念，而是要证实这个论题，即，尽管“转向”；在海德格尔的思想中，他的现象学解释学首先受到他对基督教的反思的启发。而且，这篇论文将质疑海德格尔关于历史存在的线性思考是否仍然存在于宗教现象的地平线上，正如他早期的论文和讲座中所提出的那样。虽然海德格尔对宗教和神学的早期现象学方法已经被几位作者充分阐述，并且现象学-解释学的相关性已经在他的思想中得到证明，但早期哲学方法对宗教性问题和历史存在问题之间的联系是新出现的海德格尔 1930 年代的思想缺失了。本文不仅会提到海德格尔的神学背景促成了他对存在的质疑的论点，而且它以不同的方式受到影响，