My aim is to depict Psathas’s position on ethnomethodology as a way of doing phenomenological sociology. On this, he contested with others who argued that ethnomethodology is not a phenomenological sociology at all. His claim was that ethnomethodology is a part of the phenomenological movement. In this dispute, he offered two kinds of arguments. On the one hand, he documented the strong phenomenological background of Garfinkel’s ideas. On the other hand, he found in Garfinkel’s own words expressions of gratitude to Husserl, Gurwitsch, and Schutz, among other phenomenologists. However, having proved that there was a close relation of Garfinkel with ethnomethodology, Psathas went on to show that Garfinkel turned phenomenological ideas into something new; in particular, he turned phenomenology into an experimental science dealing with the natural attitude. This is a groundbreaking contribution that Psathas appreciated and comprehended as no one else.

中文翻译：

---

作为对自然态度的实验的民族方法学：乔治·普萨萨斯论现象学社会学

我的目标是描绘 Psathas 在人种方法论上的立场，将其作为研究现象学社会学的一种方式。在这一点上，他与其他人争论说民族方法论根本不是现象学社会学。他声称民族方法论是现象学运动的一部分。在这场争论中，他提出了两种论据。一方面，他记录了加芬克尔思想的强大现象学背景。另一方面，他在加芬克尔自己的话中发现了对胡塞尔、古尔维奇和舒茨以及其他现象学家的感激之情。然而，在证明加芬克尔与民族方法学之间存在密切关系之后，帕萨塔斯继续表明加芬克尔将现象学思想转化为新事物；特别是，他把现象学变成了一门处理自然态度的实验科学。这是一项开创性的贡献，Psathas 比其他任何人都赞赏和理解。