Recently, a revival of phenomenological approaches has been gaining ground in the literature of cognition and human understanding. Heidegger’s Being-in-the-World plays a decisive role here. Instead of viewing the mind as an independent entity separated from the “outer” world, these approaches assert an immediate understanding of a meaningful environment. Such an immediate understanding is seen in the light of embodied practices, when humans are engaged in skillful absorbed coping. An analysis of Heidegger’s concept of truth provides a more sophisticated view. Being-in-the-World does not always grant direct access to an immediate understanding of a meaningful environment. Often, other objects in the world conceal themselves from human view. In a first approach, this understanding of truth will be elaborated on the basis of an exegesis of Heidegger’s text concerning his question of truth. What this actually means for a phenomenological understanding will be explained by a closer look at two central topics in Being and Time : disturbance and anxiety. The idea is to show that Heidegger’s Being-in-the-World—properly interpreted—can offer a “third way” beyond the limits of a mindless coping and an understanding of the mind as a self-standing entity detached from other entities in the world.

中文翻译：

---

重新思考在世：超越专注的应对和超脱的理性思考

最近，现象学方法的复兴在认知和人类理解的文献中取得了进展。海德格尔的“在世”在这里起着决定性的作用。这些方法不是将思想视为与“外部”世界分离的独立实体，而是断言对有意义的环境的直接理解。当人类从事熟练的专心应对时，这种直接的理解是从具身实践中看到的。对海德格尔真理概念的分析提供了更复杂的观点。身在世界并不总是允许直接访问有意义的环境的直接理解。通常，世界上的其他物体会将自己隐藏在人类视野之外。在第一种方法中，这种对真理的理解将在对海德格尔关于真理问题的文本的诠释的基础上得到阐述。这对于现象学理解的实际意义将通过对《存在与时间》中的两个中心主题的仔细观察来解释：干扰和焦虑。这个想法是为了表明海德格尔的在世——正确解释——可以提供超越无意识应对和将心灵理解为独立于世界中其他实体的独立实体的限制的“第三种方式”。世界。