In this text, I discuss the concept of culture that ethnomethodology suggests. First, I will review the sources that Garfinkel refers to: While he draws heavily on Parsons’ conception of culture, he also criticizes it with reference to Schutz. I start the second part with examining Garfinkel conception of ethnos—that suffixes ‘ethnomethodology’—to then present six salient dimensions of the ethnomethodological conception of culture: (1) recognizability; (2) normatively interspersed knowledge and cooperative continuation; (3) familiarity and trust; (4) indexicality and vagueness; (5) practice; and (6) fractality and fragmentation. The text ends with some thoughts comparing the ethnomethodological notion of culture to other conceptions.

中文翻译：

---

民族方法学的文化

在本文中，我讨论了民族方法学所建议的文化概念。首先，我将回顾加芬克尔所指的资料来源： 虽然他大量借鉴了帕森斯的文化概念，但他也参考舒茨对其进行了批评。第二部分我首先检查加芬克尔的民族概念——它是“民族方法论”的后缀——然后提出文化的民族方法论概念的六个突出维度：（1）可识别性；（2）规范的知识穿插和合作延续；(3)熟悉和信任；(4) 索引性和模糊性；（五）实践；(6) 分形和碎片化。文本的结尾是将民族方法论的文化概念与其他概念进行比较的一些想法。