当前位置: X-MOL 学术Critical Criminology › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Wildlife Management, Species Injustice and Ecocide in the Anthropocene
Critical Criminology ( IF 1.4 ) Pub Date : 2019-11-22 , DOI: 10.1007/s10612-019-09469-1
Ragnhild Sollund

Norway has been signatory to the Council of Europe’s Convention on the Conservation of European Wildlife and Natural Habitats (1979) (otherwise known as the “Bern Convention”) since 1986. Nevertheless, every year, Norwegian authorities authorize the killing of brown bears, lynx, wolves and wolverines, which are listed as strictly protected fauna species by the Bern Convention. Norway has a responsibility to protect these species and has several times been brought to court by nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) for failure to satisfy their duties under this international legal instrument. This article discusses Norway’s large predator policy and its compliance with the Bern Convention through an analysis of court decisions and judicial reasoning from the perspective of species justice for nonhumans.

中文翻译:

人类世的野生动物管理、物种不公和生态灭绝

自 1986 年以来,挪威一直是欧洲委员会关于保护欧洲野生动物和自然栖息地的公约(1979 年)(也称为“伯尔尼公约”)的签署国。 尽管如此,挪威当局每年都授权捕杀棕熊猞猁、狼和狼獾,它们被伯尔尼公约列为严格保护的动物物种。挪威有责任保护这些物种,并多次被非政府组织 (NGO) 告上法庭,原因是未能履行其在该国际法律文书下的职责。本文从非人类物种正义的角度,通过对法院判决和司法推理的分析,讨论了挪威的大型捕食者政策及其对伯尔尼公约的遵守。
更新日期:2019-11-22
down
wechat
bug