There has been a strong quest for mapping and assessing ecosystem services (ES) to support governance. Yet, the institutional landscape that governs ES provision across multiple contexts has received less attention. We fill this research gap by developing and operationalising a framework for the analysis of policy documents that address European forest ES provision. By coding and analysing references to forest ES as well as innovations and governance mechanisms addressing these ES in national strategies on forest, biodiversity and bioeconomy, we map the institutional landscape of forest ES provision in Europe. We further analyse how biophysical supply of forest ES is connected to policies paying attention to ES and identifying innovations and governance for their provision. Innovations identified in policies centre around value chains of wood and bioenergy or biodiversity conservation, while non-wood forest products, cultural heritage, and recreation receive little attention. Biophysical supply of provisioning ES is connected to policies emphasising many innovations, while little supply of regulating ES could trigger service innovations and several new governance mechanisms. As forest ecosystems have received much attention in global, European and national sustainability policies, our institutional mapping illustrates that there is room for more use of innovations in promoting ES provision.

人们强烈要求制图和评估生态系统服务（ES）以支持治理。但是，跨多个环境管理ES提供的机构环境却很少受到关注。我们通过开发和实施用于分析解决欧洲森林ES规定的政策文件的框架来填补这一研究空白。通过编码和分析对森林生态系统的参考以及针对森林，生物多样性和生物经济的国家战略中针对这些生态系统的创新和治理机制，我们绘制了欧洲森林生态系统提供的体制格局。我们进一步分析森林ES的生物物理供应如何与关注ES的政策联系起来，并确定其提供的创新和治理。政策中确定的创新围绕木材和生物能源或生物多样性保护的价值链，而非木材林产品，文化遗产和娱乐活动很少受到关注。供应ES的生物物理供应与强调许多创新的政策相关，而很少有监管ES的供应可以触发服务创新和一些新的治理机制。随着森林生态系统在全球，欧洲和国家的可持续发展政策中受到广泛关注，我们的机构制图表明，在促进提供生态系统服务方面有更多利用创新的空间。而监管ES的供应很少会触发服务创新和一些新的治理机制。随着森林生态系统在全球，欧洲和国家的可持续发展政策中受到广泛关注，我们的机构制图表明，在促进提供生态系统服务方面有更多利用创新的空间。而监管ES的供应很少会触发服务创新和一些新的治理机制。随着森林生态系统在全球，欧洲和国家的可持续发展政策中受到广泛关注，我们的机构制图表明，在促进提供生态系统服务方面有更多利用创新的空间。