The purpose of this study is to demonstrate whether neurocognitive evaluation can confirm the association between neurocognitive level and postural control and to analyze the relationship between neurocognitive level and acute musculoskeletal injury in male non-net sports athletes. Seventy-seven male non-net sports athletes participated in this study. The Standardized Assessment of Concussion (SAC), Landing Error Scoring System (LESS), Balance Error Scoring System (BESS), and Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT) were used for testing; we collected data related to injury history for six months after testing. Pearson’s correlation analysis, logistic regression, and the independent sample t-test were used for statistical analysis. The correlation between SAC and SEBT results was weak to moderate (p < 0.05). Eleven of the seventy-seven participants experienced acute lower limb injuries. SAC, LESS, BESS, and SEBT results have no effect on the occurrence of acute lower extremity injuries (p > 0.05) and were not statistically different between the injured and non-injured groups (p > 0.05). Therefore, using the SAC score alone to determine the risk factor of lower extremity injuries, except in the use of assessment after a concussion, should be cautioned against.

中文翻译：

---

神经认知功能能否预测男性大学运动员的下肢损伤？

这项研究的目的是证明神经认知评估是否可以证实神经认知水平与姿势控制之间的关联，并分析神经认知水平与男性非网状运动运动员急性肌肉骨骼损伤之间的关系。77名男性非网络体育运动员参加了这项研究。测试使用了震荡的标准评估（SAC），着陆误差评分系统（LESS），平衡误差评分系统（BESS）和星际飞镖平衡测试（SEBT）。测试后六个月，我们收集了与受伤历史相关的数据。皮尔逊相关分析，逻辑回归和独立样本t检验用于统计分析。SAC和SEBT结果之间的相关性是弱到中等（p<0.05）。77名参与者中有11名遭受了急性下肢损伤。SAC，LESS，BESS和SEBT结果对急性下肢损伤的发生没有影响（p > 0.05），受伤组和非受伤组之间无统计学差异（p > 0.05）。因此，应注意不要单独使用SAC评分来确定下肢受伤的危险因素，除非在脑震荡后进行评估。