In the article ‘High herkogamy but low reciprocity characterizes isoplethic populations of Jasminum malabaricum, a species with stigma‐height dimorphism’ by S. Ganguly and D. Barua (Plant Biology (2020), 22, 899–909, https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/plb.13127), Supporting Information file Figure S3 and its caption were inadvertently omitted from the version first published. The caption should be as follows:

The distribution of anthers (triangles) and stigmas (circles) in individuals from the four study populations of Jasminum malabaricum. Individuals are arranged in ascending order of stigma heights within the long‐ and short‐styled morphs. For the B) Bhimashankar, C) Mulshi and D) Kass populations n = 30 individuals per morph. For the A) Trimbak population n = 19 and 20 individuals for the short‐ and long‐styled morphs, respectively, were examined.

The figure is now available via the article page on Wiley Online Library. The publisher apologises for the error.

在文章“高雌雄异位但低互惠表征的isoplethic种群 素馨木棉，与柱头高度异形一个物种的由S.古利和D.巴鲁阿（植物生物学（2020），22，899-909，https：//开头DX （.doi.org / 10.1111 / plb.13127），支持信息文件在最初发布的版本中，无意中省略了图S3及其标题。标题应如下所示：

来自四个茉莉花研究种群的个体中花药（三角形）和柱头（圆形）的分布。在长样式和短样式中，个体以柱头高度的升序排列。对于B）Bhimashankar，C）Mulshi和D）Kass种群，每个形态n = 30个个体。对于A）Trimbak种群，分别检查了分别为短样式和长样式的n = 19和20个人。

现在可以通过Wiley Online Library上的文章页面获得该图。发布者对此错误表示歉意。