当前位置: X-MOL 学术Eur. Rev. Aging Phys. Act. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Map-based assessment of older adults’ life space: validity and reliability
European Review of Aging and Physical Activity ( IF 3.7 ) Pub Date : 2020-11-28 , DOI: 10.1186/s11556-020-00253-7
Timo Hinrichs , Adriana Zanda , Michelle P. Fillekes , Pia Bereuter , Erja Portegijs , Taina Rantanen , Arno Schmidt-Trucksäss , Andreas W. Zeller , Robert Weibel

Map-based tools have recently found their way into health-related research. They can potentially be used to quantify older adults’ life-space. This study aimed to evaluate the validity (vs. GPS) and the test-retest reliability of a map-based life-space assessment (MBA). Life-space of one full week was assessed by GPS and by MBA. MBA was repeated after approximately 3 weeks. Distance-related (mean and maximum distance from home) and area-related (convex hull, standard deviational ellipse) life-space indicators were calculated. Intraclass correlations (MBA vs. GPS and test-retest) were calculated in addition to Bland-Altman analyses (MBA vs. GPS). Fifty-eight older adults (mean age 74, standard deviation 5.5 years; 39.7% women) participated in the study. Bland-Altman analyses showed the highest agreement between methods for the maximum distance from home. Intraclass correlation coefficients ranged between 0.19 (95% confidence interval 0 to 0.47) for convex hull and 0.72 (95% confidence interval 0.52 to 0.84) for maximum distance from home. Intraclass correlation coefficients for test-retest reliability ranged between 0.04 (95% confidence interval 0 to 0.30) for convex hull and 0.43 (95% confidence interval 0.19 to 0.62) for mean distance from home. While acceptable validity and reliability were found for the distance-related life-space parameters, MBA cannot be recommended for the assessment of area-related life-space parameters.

中文翻译:

基于地图的老年人生活空间评估:有效性和可靠性

基于地图的工具最近已进入与健康相关的研究中。它们可能被用来量化老年人的生活空间。这项研究旨在评估基于地图的生活空间评估(MBA)的有效性(相对于GPS)和重测可靠性。GPS和MBA评估了整整一周的生活空间。大约3周后再次修读MBA。计算了距离相关的(平均和离家的最大距离)和面积相关的(凸包,标准偏差椭圆)生命空间指标。除Bland-Altman分析(MBA与GPS)之外,还计算了类内相关性(MBA与GPS和重测)。58名老年人(平均年龄74岁,标准差5.5岁;女性39.7%)参加了该研究。布兰德·奥尔特曼(Bland-Altman)的分析表明,对于距离家中最大距离的方法之间的一致性最高。类内相关系数的范围在凸包的0.19(95%置信区间0到0.47)和0.72(95%的置信区间0.52到0.84)之间。重测可靠性的类内相关系数在凸包的0.04(95%置信区间0到0.30)和0.43(95%置信区间0.19到0.62)之间。虽然找到了与距离相关的生命空间参数可接受的有效性和可靠性,但不能推荐MBA用于评估与区域相关的生命空间参数。84),以实现离家的最大距离。重测可靠性的类内相关系数在凸包的0.04(95%置信区间0到0.30)和0.43(95%置信区间0.19到0.62)之间。虽然找到了与距离相关的生命空间参数可接受的有效性和可靠性,但不能推荐MBA用于评估与区域相关的生命空间参数。84),以实现离家的最大距离。重测信度的类内相关系数在凸包的0.04(95%置信区间0到0.30)和0.43(95%置信区间0.19到0.62)之间。虽然找到了与距离相关的生命空间参数可接受的有效性和可靠性,但不能推荐MBA用于评估与区域相关的生命空间参数。
更新日期:2020-12-01
down
wechat
bug