当前位置: X-MOL 学术Can. Respir. J. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
New Insight into Laboratory Tests and Imaging Modalities for Fast and Accurate Diagnosis of COVID-19: Alternative Suggestions for Routine RT-PCR and CT—A Literature Review
Canadian Respiratory Journal ( IF 2.1 ) Pub Date : 2020-11-28 , DOI: 10.1155/2020/4648307
Amir Khorasani 1 , Amir Chegini 2 , Arezoo Mirzaei 3
Affiliation  

The globally inimitable and unremitting outbreak of COVID-19 infection confirmed the emergency need for critical detection of human coronavirus infections. Laboratory diagnostic tests and imaging modalities are two test groups used for the detection of COVID-19. Nowadays, real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and computed tomography (CT) have been frequently utilized in the clinic. Some limitations that confront with these tests are false-negative results, tests redone for follow-up procedure, high cost, and unable to do for all patients. To overcome these limitations, modified and alternative tests must be considered. Among these tests, RdRp/Hel RT-PCR assay had the lowest diagnostic limitation and highest sensitivity and specificity for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in both respiratory tract and nonrespiratory tract clinical specimens. On the other hand, lung ultrasound (LUS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are CT-alternative imaging modalities for the management, screening, and follow-up of COVID-19 patients.

中文翻译:


对快速准确诊断 COVID-19 的实验室测试和成像方式的新见解:常规 RT-PCR 和 CT 的替代建议 — 文献综述



全球范围内独一无二且持续不断的 COVID-19 感染爆发证实了对人类冠状病毒感染进行严格检测的紧急需求。实验室诊断测试和成像方式是用于检测 COVID-19 的两个测试组。目前,实时聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)和计算机断层扫描(CT)已在临床上得到广泛应用。这些测试面临的一些限制是假阴性结果、为后续程序重新进行测试、成本高以及无法对所有患者进行测试。为了克服这些限制,必须考虑修改和替代测试。在这些测试中,RdRp/Hel RT-PCR 检测对于呼吸道和非呼吸道临床标本中 SARS-CoV-2 RNA 的检测具有最低的诊断局限性和最高的敏感性和特异性。另一方面,肺部超声 (LUS) 和磁共振成像 (MRI) 是用于管理、筛查和随访 COVID-19 患者的 CT 替代成像方式。
更新日期:2020-12-01
down
wechat
bug