当前位置: X-MOL 学术Hydrol. Sci. J. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Streamflow naturalization methods: a review
Hydrological Sciences Journal ( IF 2.8 ) Pub Date : 2020-11-26 , DOI: 10.1080/02626667.2020.1839080
Morgane Terrier 1 , Charles Perrin 1 , Alban de Lavenne 2 , Vazken Andréassian 1 , Julien Lerat 3 , Jai Vaze 4
Affiliation  

ABSTRACT Over the past few decades, several naturalization methods have been developed for removing anthropogenic influences from streamflow time series, to the point that naturalized flows are often considered true natural flows in many studies. However, such trust in a particular naturalization method does not expose the assumptions underlying the method, nor does it quantifies the associated uncertainty. This review provides an overview of streamflow naturalization approaches. The terminology associated with naturalization is discussed, and a classification of naturalization methods according to their data requirements and main assumptions is proposed. A large set of studies developing or applying naturalization methods are reviewed, and the main challenges associated with the methods applied are assessed. To give a more concrete example, a focus is made on studies conducted in France over the last decade, which applied naturalization methods to estimate water extraction limits in rivers.

中文翻译:

流流归化方法:综述

摘要 在过去的几十年里,已经开发了几种归化方法来从河流时间序列中消除人为影响,以至于在许多研究中归化的流通常被认为是真正的自然流。然而,对特定入籍方法的这种信任不会暴露该方法背后的假设,也不会量化相关的不确定性。本综述概述了水流自然化方法。讨论了与归化相关的术语,并根据归化方法的数据要求和主要假设提出了归化方法的分类。审查了大量开发或应用归化方法的研究,并评估了与应用方法相关的主要挑战。举一个更具体的例子,
更新日期:2020-11-26
down
wechat
bug