Correction to the article TEE23147 published in the July issue of IEEJ Transactions on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Vol. 15, No. 7, 2020, pp. 1032–1039. DOI:10.1002/tee.23147

Table II of the above article was incorrect. It should have read as follows:

Table II. Reduction rates (%) in the voltage violating time

Case No.	71.7% PV installation		100% PV installation
	Method 1	Method 2	Method 1	Method 2
1	59.1	69.7	80.7	97.2
2	50.5	10.9	−59.6	62.6
3	71.6	90.3	83.1	97.7
4	15.1	41.1	75.4	81.7
5	74.9	88.9	85.5	97.6
6	69.4	92.8	83.2	98.4
7	75.4	88.8	85.9	97.5
8	72.4	96.3	84.0	98.7
9	41.2	56.9	82.9	96.5
10	26.9	35.7	73.2	77.7
Average	55.7	67.1	67.4	90.6

The publisher apologizes for any inconvenience this may have caused.

中文翻译：

---

勘误表

对TEE23147文章的更正，该文章发表在《IEEJ电气和电子工程学报》第七卷上。2020年第15期，第7期，第1032-1039页。DOI：10.1002 / tee.23147

以上文章的表II不正确。它的内容如下：

表二。违反电压时间的降低率（％）

案号	光伏安装量的71.7％		100％光伏安装
	方法1	方法2	方法1	方法2
1个	59.1	69.7	80.7	97.2
2	50.5	10.9	−59.6	62.6
3	71.6	90.3	83.1	97.7
4	15.1	41.1	75.4	81.7
5	74.9	88.9	85.5	97.6
6	69.4	92.8	83.2	98.4
7	75.4	88.8	85.9	97.5
8	72.4	96.3	84.0	98.7
9	41.2	56.9	82.9	96.5
10	26.9	35.7	73.2	77.7
平均	55.7	67.1	67.4	90.6

对于由此带来的任何不便，出版商深表歉意。