The recent proliferation of resilience discourses invited critical inquiries into the concept and its ability to construct policy narratives of “certainty.” Critical works have deconstructed and debated the instrumentalist notions of resilience as overly simplified, raised to the forefront questions of power, emphasised the linkages of the concept to dominant political and economic regimes, and underscored the absence of any real call for transformative action, hence leading to the reproduction of perpetuating crises over the long run. To explore the structure of the critical literature on resilience, we map the ways in which critical trajectories developed and travelled across thematic communities. We use bibliometric analysis to examine 49 years of resilience literature from international relations, geography, political ecology, and other social science disciplines that foremost focused on questions of power, inequality, and social justice. As a result, this paper delves into the composition of different types of critique mobilised in resilience scholarship and identifies the interdependencies between modes of critical thought and their degree of interdisciplinary connectivity.

中文翻译：

---

韧性的关键转折：绘制主题社区和批判性奖学金的模式

复原力话语的近来激增，引起了对该概念及其构建“确定性”政策叙述的能力的批判性研究。批判性著作对过分简化的工具主义韧性概念进行了解构和辩论，提出了最重要的权力问题，强调了该概念与主要政治和经济制度的联系，并强调了缺乏任何真正的要求采取变革性行动的呼吁，因此导致从长远来看，这种危机会延续下去。为了探索有关适应力的批判性文献的结构，我们绘制了关键轨迹发展并跨主题社区传播的方式。我们采用文献计量分析方法，从国际关系，地理，政治生态，以及其他社会科学学科，这些学科主要关注权力，不平等和社会正义问题。结果，本文深入研究了在韧性研究中动员的不同类型批评的构成，并确定了批判性思维模式与学科交叉程度之间的相互依存关系。