当前位置: X-MOL 学术Crop Pasture Sci. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Sulfur and nitrogen responses by barley and wheat on a sandy soil in a semi-arid environment
Crop & Pasture Science ( IF 1.8 ) Pub Date : 2020-11-19 , DOI: 10.1071/cp20280
M. K. Conyers , J. E. Holland , B. Haskins , R. Whitworth , G. J. Poile , A. Oates , V. van der Rijt , E. Tavakkoli

Soil testing guidelines for sulfur (S) under dryland cropping in south-eastern Australia are not well developed. Our objective was to assess the value of soil and tissue tests for S and nitrogen (N), because the two minerals frequently interact), in predicting S-deficient sites and hence increasing the probability of response to application of S (and N). Here, we report three proximal experiments in 2014–16 for barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) on a sandy soil in a semi-arid environment near Merriwagga in western New South Wales. The trials contained a factorial combination of four rates of each of applied N as urea and S as high-grade gypsum.

Responses to S were obtained for dry matter (DM) quantity and nutrient content at flowering in 2014, but no grain-yield response was obtained in any year. DM response to applied S was obtained when the concentration of S in the DM was increased from 0.08% in barley and 0.09% in wheat without S application to 0.10–0.11% in both crops with S applied as gypsum. Because we obtained no grain-yield responses to applied S, the 0.10% S in grain was likely to have been adequate for both crops in these experiments. A pool of subsoil S was accessed during each season and this compensated for any DM deficiencies of S by the time of grainfill. Shallow soil tests (0–10 cm) for S can therefore indicate sufficiency but not necessarily deficiency; therefore, in grain-cropping areas, we recommend soil S tests on the same samples as used for deep N testing (to 60 cm) and that an S-budgeting approach be used following the soil tests. Furthermore, for marginal nutritional circumstances such as occurred in this study, the supporting use of N : S ratio is recommended, with values >17 in DM or grain likely to indicate S deficiency for both barley and wheat.



中文翻译:

半干旱环境下沙质土壤上大麦和小麦对硫和氮的响应

在澳大利亚东南部干旱地区种植的土壤中硫(S)的土壤测试指南尚未完善。我们的目标是评估土壤和组织测试中S和N(N)的价值,因为这两种矿物质经常相互作用)在预测S缺乏的部位时,从而增加了对施用S(和N)的反应可能性。在这里,我们报告了2014-16年度在新南威尔士州西部Merriwagga附近半干旱环境中的沙质土壤上的大麦(Hordeum vulgare L.)和小麦(Triticum aestivum L.)的三个近端实验。该试验包含四种比例的因子分解组合,每种比例施用的N作为尿素,S作为高等级石膏。

2014年开花时对干物质(DM)的数量和养分含量对S的响应,但在任何一年中均未获得籽粒产量的响应。当DM中的S浓度从大麦中的0.08%和不施用S的小麦中的0.09%增加到两种以S施用石膏的农作物中的0.10–0.11%时,DM对施用的S的反应均获得。由于我们没有获得对施用S的籽粒产量的响应,因此在这些实验中,两种作物的籽粒中0.10%的S可能已经足够。在每个季节都进入了一个地下土壤S的池,这可以在填谷之前弥补S的任何DM不足。因此,对S进行浅层土壤测试(0–10 cm)可以表明足够,但不一定不足。因此,在谷物种植区,我们建议在与用于深氮测试(至60厘米)的样品相同的样品上进行土壤S测试,并在土壤测试后使用S预算法。此外,对于本研究中出现的边缘营养情况,建议支持使用N:S比率,DM或谷物中的值> 17可能表明大麦和小麦都缺乏S。

更新日期:2020-11-19
down
wechat
bug